Super interesting episode! I am curious why Snyder's legal team decided to argue with a view to the outrageous behavior of the Westboro protestors rather than their own voliated rights to speech. It sounds like the protestors were both seen and heard (despite what Marge told the Justices). Surely one's right to speech stops when it infringes on the speech of another?
Yes, but injured parties have the right to pursue remedies for the harm they do with that speech.
Super interesting episode! I am curious why Snyder's legal team decided to argue with a view to the outrageous behavior of the Westboro protestors rather than their own voliated rights to speech. It sounds like the protestors were both seen and heard (despite what Marge told the Justices). Surely one's right to speech stops when it infringes on the speech of another?
free to speak - free to get sued
Yes, we do. Regardless how loathsome.